Sophos, a global player of innovative security solutions for defeating cyberattacks, recently released “Pacific Rim,”a report detailing its defensive and counter-offensive operation over the last five years with multiple interlinked nation-state adversaries based in China targeting perimeter devices, including Sophos Firewalls.
The attackers used a series of campaigns with novel exploits and customized malware to embed tools to conduct surveillance, sabotage and cyberespionage as well as overlapping tactics, tools and procedures (TTPs) with well-known Chinese nation-state groups including Volt Typhoon, APT31 and APT41.
The adversaries targeted both small and large critical infrastructure and government targets, primarily located in South and South-East Asia, including nuclear energy suppliers, a national capital’s airport, a military hospital, state security apparatus, and central government ministries.
Throughout Pacific Rim, Sophos X-Ops, the company’s cybersecurity and threat intelligence unit, worked to neutralize the adversaries’ moves and continuously evolved defenses and counter-offensives. After Sophos successfully responded to the initial attacks, the adversaries escalated their efforts and brought in more experienced operators. Sophos subsequently uncovered a vast adversarial ecosystem.
While Sophos released details starting in 2020 on the campaigns associated, including Cloud Snooper and Asnarök, the company is sharing the overall investigation analysis to raise awareness of the persistence of Chinese nation-state adversaries and their hyperfocus to compromise perimeter, unpatched and end-of-life (EOL) devices, often via zero-day exploits they are creating for those devices. Sophos is also encouraging all organizations to urgently apply patches for vulnerabilities discovered in any of their internet-facing devices and to migrate any older unsupported devices to current models. Sophos regularly updates all of its supported products based on new threats and indicators of compromise (IoCs) to protect customers. Sophos Firewall customers are protected via rapid hotfixes that are now turned on by default.
“The reality is that edge devices have become highly attractive targets for Chinese nation-state groups like Volt Typhoon and others as they look to build operational relay boxes (ORBs) to obfuscate and support their activity. This includes directly targeting an organization for espionage, or indirectly leveraging any weak points for onward attacks – essentially becoming collateral damage. Even organizations that are not targets are getting hit. Network devices designed for businesses are natural targets for these purposes – they are powerful, always on, and have constant connectivity,” said Ross McKerchar, CISO at Sophos. “When a group seeking to build a global network of ORBs targeted some of our devices, we responded by applying the same detection and response techniques we use to defend our corporate endpoints and network devices. This allowed us to burn multiple operations and tap into a valuable stream of threat intelligence that we applied to protect our customers from both future widespread attacks and highly targeted operations.”
Highlights of the Report
- On Dec. 4, 2018, a low-privileged computer connected to an overhead display began to scan the Sophos network—seemingly on its own—at the India headquarters of Cyberoam, a company Sophos acquired in 2014. Sophos found a payload quietly listening for specialized inbound internet traffic on the computer that contained a novel type of backdoor and a complex rootkit — “Cloud Snooper.”
- In April 2020, after several organizations reported a user interface pointing to a domain with “Sophos” in its name. Sophos worked with European law enforcement, which tracked down and confiscated the server the adversaries used to deploy malicious payloads in what Sophos later dubbed Asnarök. Sophos neutralized Asnarök, which the company was able to attribute to China, by taking over the malware’s command and control (C2) channel. It also allowed Sophos to neutralize a planned wave of botnet attacks.
- After Asnarök, Sophos advanced its intelligence operations by creating an additional threat actor tracking program focused on identifying and disrupting adversaries looking to exploit Sophos devices deployed in customer environments; the program was built using a combination of open-source intelligence, web analytics, telemetry monitoring, and targeted kernel implants deployed to the attackers’ research devices.
- Next, the attackers showed an increasing level of persistence, upleveling their tactics and deploying increasingly stealthy malware. However, using its threat actor tracking program and enhanced telemetry gathering capabilities, Sophos was able to pre-empt several attacks and obtain a copy of a UEFI bootkit and custom exploits before they could be deployed broadly.
- A few months later, Sophos tracked some of the attacks to an adversary who has demonstrated links to China and Sichuan Silence Information Technology’s Double Helix Research Institute in the country’s Chengdu region.
- In March 2022, an anonymous security researcher reported a zero-day remote code execution vulnerability, designated CVE-2022-1040, to Sophos as part of the company’s bug bounty program. Further investigation revealed that this CVE was already being exploited in the wild in multiple operations—operations that Sophos was then able to stop impacting customers. After deeper analysis, Sophos determined the person reporting the exploit may have had a connection to the adversaries. This was the second time Sophos received a suspiciously timed “tip” about an exploit before it was used maliciously.
“Recent advisories from CISA have made it clear that Chinese nation-state groups have become a perennial threat to nations’ critical infrastructure,” McKerchar continued. “What we tend to forget is that small- and medium-sized businesses—those that form the bulk of the supply chain for critical infrastructure—are targets since they are often the weak links in this supply chain. Unfortunately, these businesses often have fewer resources to defend against such sophisticated threats. Further complicating matters is the tendency for these adversaries to gain a foothold and dig in, making it hard to evict them. The modus operandi of China-based adversaries is creating long-term persistence and complex obfuscated attacks. They won’t stop until they’re disrupted.”
